The battle for softness:Asics Gel Nimbus 26 or Brooks Glycerin Max? Find out which is best for you

The battle for softness:Asics Gel Nimbus 26 or Brooks Glycerin Max? Find out which is best for you
Gorka Sedano
Gorka Sedano
Journalist and popular runner
Posted on 26-09-2024

At RUNNEA Magazine, we continue to break down and analyze the most outstanding runningshoes models of this year 2024, and today it's the turn of two true titans in the universe of maximum cushioning running. We will compare the Asics Gel Nimbus 26 and the Brooks Glycerin Max, two models that have earned a place in the feet of popular runners thanks to their comfort, cushioning but also softness in running.

The battle for smoothness:Asics Gel Nimbus 26 or Brooks Glycerin Max? Find out which is best for you

Let's put ourselves in a situation. Imagine you're ready for your weekly long run. On your left, the award-winning Asics Gel Nimbus 26; on your right, the innovative Brooks Glycerin Max. Which one would you choose for those sessions when you're looking for maximum cushioning to protect your joints but you also want softness without losing stability? In this article, we're going to help you answer that question.

A bit of context: the evolution of two legendary sagas

The Asics Gel Nimbus have been on the feet of runners all over the world for more than two decades. With each new version, Asics has sought to refine comfort and cushioning, and the Nimbus 26 is no exception (although it is true that it looks a lot like the Asics Nimbus 25). This model has managed to find its niche among those looking for a soft, highly cushioned and supportive ride, ideal for long distances or recovery training.

In the other corner of the ring we have the Brooks Glycerin Max, one of the most recent bets of the American brand Brooks. However the Glycerin saga has always been an iconic model for its good running sensations, but with the new Max version, everything has been taken to a higher level. A greater focus has been placed on maximum comfort and smooth transitions. Lots of cushioning, but with a softer feel than we are used to from Seattle.

The battle for softness:Asics Gel Nimbus 26 or Brooks Glycerin Max? Find out which is best for you

Cushioning Technologies: Gel and FF Blast+ vs DNA Tuned

This is where the magic of the innovation departments of both companies comes to the fore. Both models are designed to offer a smooth and comfortable ride, but they achieve this through different technologies. And with the added challenge of not losing stability.

Asics Gel Nimbus 26: PureGel and FlyteFoam BLAST PLUS ECO

Asics Nimbus 26

In the new Gel Nimbus 26, Asics once again opts for PureGel in the heel area, a key component of its cushioning but in a lighter and more refined version than the traditional Gel. This new PureGel system is strategically placed in the heel to absorb impacts on landing more efficiently, providing a smooth ride from the first contact with the ground.

But the success does not only lie in the PureGel, the real protagonist in the midsole is the FlyteFoam Blast+ ECO foam, a lighter and more sustainable evolution of the traditional FlyteFoam. This foam will offer a perfect combination of lightness and soft cushioning, also reducing the environmental impact by being composed of recycled materials. In addition, this foam maintains a plus of reactivity for those of you who are looking for that touch of dynamism in every stride.

The result is a fluid running experience, perfect for runners looking for maximum comfort and reduced fatigue over long distances, but who also need a shoe that responds to slightly faster paces without losing smoothness.

Brooks Glycerin Max: DNA Tuned

The Brooks Glycerin Max incorporates the brand's latest technology: DNA Tuned, a nitrogen-infused foam that offers soft cushioning in the heel and a more agile response in the forefoot area. This technology is designed to deliver just the right amount of cushioning for your stride, providing a personalized experience. Visually it is maximalist and very comfortable, but when you run with it you realize that it will also be responsive if you need it to be.

One of the most outstanding features of the Glycerin Max is its GlideRoll Rocker, a rocker that eases the transition from heel to toe, improving your running economy and reducing muscle strain. With each stride, you'll feel like you can run farther with less effort, something I consider important for all those runners looking to improve their endurance over long distances.

FlyteFoam BLAST PLUS ECO vs DNA Tuned? The fight for smoothness

In terms of feel, the Asics Nimbus 26 offers a very soft and fluid cushioning, but firmer than the Brooks Glyceryn Max. They are perfect for those of you who are looking for a comfortable but not overly soft ride. The combination of PureGel and FF Blast Plus Eco guarantees a wide stride at all times, but with that little bit of hardness that will come in handy if you speed up the pace a bit. It also gives a little more stability to the stride.

On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin Max offers a similarly soft cushioning, but with a more modern and reactive approach if you need it. The DNA Tuned with nitrogen provides a smooth feel, but without losing that touch of agility on every toe-off. I find it an ideal choice for runners of almost any weight who are looking for comfort, but don't want to sacrifice the feel of a dynamic run.

The battle for smoothness:Asics Gel Nimbus 26 or Brooks Glycerin Max? Find out which is best for you

Pros and cons of the Asics Nimbus 26 vs Brooks Glycerin Max

Let's cut to the chase. Below, we break down the pros and cons of both models so you can visualize how they would perform in your workouts or races.

Asics Gel Nimbus 26

Pros

  • Ample cushioning: Asics ' combination of PureGel and FF Blast Plus Eco remains one of the best shock absorbing technologies, ideal for those looking for protection in every stride.
  • Durability: The AHAR+ outsole offers excellent wear resistance, ensuring a long lifespan even in tough workouts.
  • Long-distance comfort: Perfect for long runs or recovery training.

We liked less

  • Weight: Still a slightly heavier shoe compared to other options on the market.
  • Price: 200 starting price

Brooks Glycerin Max

Pros

  • Personalized cushioning: DNA Tuned adapts to your stride, offering a more personalized and efficient experience.
  • Smooth transitions: Thanks to the GlideRoll Rocker, heel-to-toe transitions are fluid and natural.
  • Sustainability: The Glycerin Max incorporate 18% bio-based materials, reducing their carbon footprint.

We liked less

  • Initial stiffness: The first few days you may need a certain period of adaptation due to their more robust structure. But once you get used to them, you won't want to take them off.
  • Price: As with the Nimbus 26, their starting price is 200

Training and racing performance

Both shoes shine when it comes to long runs and daily workouts, but they have nuances that make them more suitable for different types of sessions.

Asics Gel Nimbus 26: Ideal for longer distances

If your priority is comfort but with a greater focus on support during long runs, the Asics Gel Nimbus 26 is a fantastic choice Nimbus 26 Its cushioning, softness and protective feel with every stride make the miles fly by, protecting your joints and muscles from constant impact.

Brooks Glycerin Max: Comfort and responsiveness in a single shoe

The Brooks Glycerin Max, on the other hand, is perfect for those looking for a balance between softness and responsiveness. Its ability to offer customized cushioning, along with the GlideRoll Rocker, will allow you to maintain a steady and efficient pace on long workouts, without sacrificing responsiveness on every takeoff despite the shoe's bulky feel.

What type of runner are you? Recommended uses

The battle for smoothness:Asics Gel Nimbus 26 or Brooks Glycerin Max? Find out which is best for you

Now that we've analyzed the features and performance of both models, let's determine which type of runner would benefit the most from each shoe.

Beginner runners

  • Asics Gel Nimbus 26: Ideal if you are just starting out in running and need a shoe that offers maximum cushioning and protection.
  • Brooks Glycerin Max: Can be an excellent choice if you are looking for a comfortable shoe but with a touch of reactivity to improve your technique and endurance.

Intermediate runners

  • Asics Gel Nimbus 26: Perfect if you are increasing your mileage and need a shoe that gives you confidence for long distances and your weight is over 80kg.
  • Brooks Glycerin Max: Ideal for those who are just starting to work on their base speed, but don't want to sacrifice cushioning and comfort.

Advanced runners

  • Asics Gel Nimbus 26: Ideal for recovery workouts or days when you're looking for a comfortable run without overloading your body.
  • Brooks Glycerin Max: Excellent for intense workouts and long runs, where you need a shoe that allows you to keep up the pace with maximum comfort.

Asics Gel Nimbus 26 or Brooks Glycerin Max?

In the end, the choice between the Asics Gel Nimbus 26 and the Brooks Glycerin Max depends on what you are looking for as a runner.

If your priority is softness, comfort with some support over long distances, the Asics Gel Nimbus 26 is an excellent choice Nimbus 26

On the other hand, if you prefer a shoe that offers more responsiveness without losing comfort, the Brooks Glycerin Max is the perfect choice.

Whatever your choice, both shoes guarantee you a first-class running experience, so now it's your turn! You already know that you can compare prices at RUNNEA.

Read more news about: Running News

Gorka Sedano

Gorka Sedano

Journalist and popular runner

Graduate in information sciences from the University of the Basque Country. Journalist by vocation and profession. They say that dreaming is free, but without perseverance, those dreams do not materialize. I am a popular runner, one of those who looks at the heart rate monitor to see the kilometers run rather than the time invested in running them. I am passionate about sports equipment.